Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000 +5823%
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy