Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +6590%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy