Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 30W)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M +3104%
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
837 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy