NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Tesla C2070
+4795%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
8
Shading Units
448
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
238W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
