Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1329MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB +45261%
9.526 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jun 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1190 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1329 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
56
8
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
127.6 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
297.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.05 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.526 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
4.763 TFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-893-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy