Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (295W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +9758%
61.32 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
384
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

295W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy