Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M +21%
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro NVS
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
12W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy