Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +41936%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
26
8
Shading Units
3328
4
TMUs
104
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy