CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+41936%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
VS
RTX A2000
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
26
8
Shading Units
3328
4
TMUs
104
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
2
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
4
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
6
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla P10
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy