Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile +51%
1.555 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF100
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy