Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2100MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
18816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +8527%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
640
Shading Units
19456
40
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
MI300
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy