Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 +231%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P1000 +342%
155
Quadro K2000M
35
OctaneBench
Quadro P1000 +166%
32
Quadro K2000M
12
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK107
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy