Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 +42%
1.894 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF110
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy