CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+271%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
VS
Arctic Sound 1T
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
6144
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
4
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
5
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
6
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
7
NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
8
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M40
10
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy