Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile +2904%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
4
1152
Shading Units
32
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy