Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile +157%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile +145%
231
Quadro K4000M
94
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile +170%
54
Quadro K4000M
20
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
960
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy