Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1291MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile +244%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy