NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1480MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+229%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
40
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
TU102
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
