Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1480MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +129%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA106
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy