Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +4423%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
G84
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy