Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +829%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy