Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +13677%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
40
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
G98
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy