Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1700MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +646%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
40
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy