Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile +35%
3.11 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK104
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy