NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+3787%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
4
1280
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G84
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
