Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1480MHz vs 1215MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile +2%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
8
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GP106
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net