Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile +1010%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G92
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy