Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1950MHz vs 1404MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +25%
5.032 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy