Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +1210%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
226W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy