Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +32429%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy