Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1543MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +284%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy