NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1785MHz vs 1543MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+51%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1328 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
