Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +654%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy