Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1543MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +721%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy