Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2100MHz vs 1252MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
19200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +25391%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
19456
16
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
MI300
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy