Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +17%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
-
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK104
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy