Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1252MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +454%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK110B
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy