Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1530MHz vs 1252MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +2344%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GV100
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy