Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000 Mobile
4.398 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +929%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
13312
112
TMUs
832
64
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
137.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
68.71 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
4.398 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
137.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N17E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy