Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (105W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 243.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
5.304 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +160%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
7680
112
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy