Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1647MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4200 Mobile +638%
7.589 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1227 MHz
Base Clock
-
1647 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
448
144
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
237.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
118.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.589 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
237.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy