NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+64%
6.48 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+46%
546
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+87%
118
Tesla K20Xm
63
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2688
128
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK110
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
