Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +1326%
8.873 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy