NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1569MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+72%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
7680
160
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
