NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1569MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+281%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+293%
126
Quadro K4200
32
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1344
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
