Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q +681%
8.033 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
448
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy