NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+13250%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
