Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +4982%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
64
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy