Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +1085%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1430 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
8192
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy