Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 42W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile +1756%
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1430 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy