Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 +158%
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy